Feeding wild baby birds – David Attenborough – BBC wildlife
August 11, 2010 Seed Bird Feeder
Baby birds have very demanding stomachs! In this clip we watch feeding in action. From the BBC.
Related Blogs
Comments (25)
Seed Bird Feeder
Hummingbirds At Home
|
Hummingbirds are fun, entertaining, full of energy and it’s easy to attract hummingbirds.
Tags
animals
backyard
bird
birdfeeder
bird feeder
bird feeders
bird food
Birds
birdseed
bird seed
bird seeds
Blue
British
cardinals
chickadees
doves
droll
feeder
feeders
feeding
finch
finches
food
funny
garden
goldfinch
hummingbird
nature
peanuts
Proof
seed
seeds
Sparrow
sparrows
squirrel
squirrels
suet
sunflower
sunflower seeds
thistle
wild
wild bird
wild birds
wild bird seed
Wildlife
Recent Posts
- When I put out birdseed all I ever get is brown sparrows. How to get more colorful and varied species in yard?
- Creative ideas after the wedding ceremony, (bubbles, birdseed…)?
- Does any one have a recipe for birdseed blocks without suet?
- are two year old bird seeds still ok?
- Is my Cockatiel food really unhealthy?
- Is it okay to feed my parrot wild bird food?
- what is good to feed squirrels in your backyard other then feeding them birdseed?
- wild bird feeding question?
- I have birdseed spread all over my yard including 3 bird feeders. Why aren't there any sparrows around?
- If I feed wild birds to much food will they over eat like fish and die?
Categories
Recent Comments
- Youdontknowme on Is my Cockatiel food really unhealthy?
- Thea on Is my Cockatiel food really unhealthy?
- thefinalresult on Is it okay to feed my parrot wild bird food?
- wacky on Is it okay to feed my parrot wild bird food?
- Maw-Maw on what is good to feed squirrels in your backyard other then feeding them birdseed?
altruistic behaviour is selected for by evolution, if the cost for the altruist (C), multiplied by the grade of relatedness between the altruist and the beneficiary (r) minus the benefit (B) is bigger than zero= r*C-B>0 (Hamiltons rule)
In general animals are moved by the omnipresent spirit of God. God is Love, and Love maintains existence, so many animals are gently taking care of their offsprings and are to protect themselves and their offsprings. However, Love is also self-sacrificing, so many animals, without being aware of it, are self-sacrificing when they serve as food to their predators. Glory to Love, glory to the Father and the Son!
GOD IS NOT REAL HE IS A JOKE
YOU ARE A JOKE!!!!!! YOU SUCK!!
In general you are talking out of a hole in your ass.
animals are moved by the omnipresent spirit of instinct, environment and experience.
hey today i found a baby bird so i took it home(it was gonna be eaten by big birds) and i fed it full worms,every hour or so i feed it,is that right?i dont really know what to feed it,and is it ok to use bleach to find worms more easily?cuz thats what i did,and to give it water i just hold a water bottle over its mouth,it opsens,then i tip a few drops in,is that ok?and how much water does it need,please give me full info
How can’t you see GOD in this film?
Is it possible to do theirselves. Only idiots believe in that.
very fragile and cute
@P01029 in science theories are above laws. gravity is a theory too.
@vealicle1 actually no. Laws are PROVEN already. Theories are still unproven.
@P01029 you’re confusing the scientific definitions of hypothesis versus theory. It’s a very common creationist mistake. Actually, even “laws” in science can be disproved. Theories on the other hand are often made up of several different laws or bodies of collected data, and are used as an accurate model to explain phenomena. If the underlying data or law supporting the theory is proven false, than the theory is considered invalid.
@P01029 The theory of gravity, the theory of general relativity, and the theory of evolution have all withstood falsification so far. Evolution is considered just as valid scientifically as the theory gravity. Of course, that is not to say that evolution or gravity cannot be disproved, but in science nothing s ever proven, only strongly supported by the empirical evidence available.
@vealicle1 Yes and these strongly supported theories are called Laws.
@P01029 wrong.
@vealicle1 Obviously someone failed their sciences
and by someone I meant you.
@P01029 wrong again, and not a very clever retort. I could be wrong, but I’m gonna wager you may have been home schooled by a parent lacking scientific qualifications or just went to a school with a very poor science curriculum.
@vealicle1 extremely wrong. Try honored engineering science at UofT
@vealicle1 and btw, this is getting realli pathetic. Go google or check a dictionary for the definition of Laws and Theories and it will all become clear to you. I will not use any further energy in explaining to a clueless and stubborn moron. Goodbye.
A theory is more like a scientific law than a hypothesis. A theory is an explanation of a set of related observations or events based upon proven hypotheses and verified multiple times by detached groups of researchers. One scientist cannot create a theory; he can only create a hypothesis.
In general, both a scientific theory and a scientific law are accepted to be true by the scientific community as a whole. Both are used to make predictions of events. Both are used to advance technology.
In fact, some laws, such as the law of gravity, can also be theories when taken more generally. The law of gravity is expressed as a single mathematical expression and is presumed to be true all over the universe and all through time. Without such an assumption, we can do no science based on gravity’s effects. But from the law, we derived the theory of gravity which describes how gravity works,what causes it, and how it behaves.
We also use that to develop another theory, Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, in which gravity plays a crucial role. The basic law is intact, but the theory expands it to include various and complex situations involving space and time.
The biggest difference between a law and a theory is that a theory is much more complex and dynamic. A law describes a single action, whereas a theory explains an entire group of related phenomena.
Oh, this is fascinating and the Narrator is charming.
What a Class video as well as educational.
KUDOS!
@vealicle1 again, please look up the definition b4 talking to me or better yet, not talk to me because I find it really pointless to explain to a person who is very stubborn and unwilling to learn. Please, if you really don’t want to face the facts then stop responding cuz it’s a waste of both of our time.
Once again speechless as usual!
awwww.eagles should be more like these family loving birds.